. ©MAZAL LIBRARY

NMT10-T0219


. NUERNBERG MILITARY TRIBUNAL
Volume X · Page 219
Previous Page Home PageArchive
Table of Contents
MacMahon was a general in the war of 1870-71 and President of the French republic. There is, therefore, nothing peculiar if a general passes from the military to the political field.

German history does not furnish many incidents of this kind. Count Moltke who conducted the three wars preceding the establishment of the German Reich kept himself entirely out of politics. Only one of his successors, Count Waldersee, showed some political ambition, but his tenure of office as Chief of the General Staff was short. Count Schlieffen was a soldier and nothing but a soldier. The younger Moltke lacked political talents. It was only during the last years of the war, 1914-18, that Ludendorff exerted more and more influence on politics, and the consequence of his activities was that the propaganda of the leftist parties in Germany magnified the role of military influence in politics to such an extent that the good name of the army was beclouded in public opinion for long. As a result of this development, von Seeckt, who was responsible for the Reichswehr after 1919, decided to keep the Reichswehr entirely out of politics. He succeeded so completely that foreigners were frequently puzzled as to why military leaders in high positions after von Seeckt’s time were so entirely inept politically and were unable to build up a front against Hitler. Here a lesson of history was heeded and actually translated into reality.

By the end of the 'twenties the Reichswehr had developed into that what an army should be, nothing but an instrument of the legitimate political leaders of the nation. Von Seeckt left only two political disciples among the generals of the higher commands: von Schleicher and von Hammerstein. A recent study by the German Chancellor Bruening who was the last prominent political figure before 1933, reveals that he, who is universally regarded as the last democratic chancellor, contemplated with these two generals the destruction of the growing National Socialist Party at the end of the ’twenties by using the army to crush it. He was only prevented from doing so by the resistance of von Hindenburg, who argued that the armed forces should not be used against any one party. If it was to be used, he decided, that should be done against the National Socialists and the Communists simultaneously. Bruening did not advise his cabinet about his plans, nor did von Schleicher and von Hammerstein advise any other generals about them; certainly, none of those who are now defendants in this case. I am emphasizing this in order to illustrate how feeble a plant the democratic idea was in the Weimar Republic. It must be almost unbelievable for men who have always lived under a democratic or parliamentary system of government that such a state of affairs could prevail in a republic; that instead of carry- […ing]
 

 
219
Next Page NMT Home Page